Discover
International Cosmetics Animal Testing Bans
Please note that while these laws and policies are referred to as “bans,” exceptions likely exist.
Jurisdiction | Year of Ban | Highlights |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2020 | Australia banned animal testing for cosmetics in 2020. [170] |
Austria | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Austria in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Brazil | 2023 | Brazil banned animal testing for cosmetics in 2023. [172] |
Belgium | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Belgium in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Bulgaria | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Bulgaria in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Canada | 2023 | Canada banned both animal testing for cosmetics and the import of cosmetics tested on animals in 2023. [166][167] |
Chile | 2025 | Chile banned animal testing for cosmetics in 2025. [175] |
Colombia | 2020 | Colombia banned animal testing for cosmetics as well as the import, export, and marketing of cosmetics that have been tested on animals in 2020. [174] |
Croatia | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Croatia in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Cyprus | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Cyprus in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Czech Republic | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in the Czech Republic in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Denmark | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Denmark in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Estonia | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Estonia in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
European Union | 2004 | The EU banned animal testing on finished cosmetic products in 2004. In 2009, the EU banned animal testing on ingredients for cosmetics, as well as the marketing of any cosmetics tested on animals. However, per the REACH regulation, companies can apply for a license to test cosmetic ingredients on animals if the ingredients in large quantities may cause harm to employees or the environment. [157][158] |
Finland | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Finland in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
France | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in France in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Germany | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Germany in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Greece | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Greece in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Guatemala | 2017 | Guatemala banned animal testing for cosmetics in 2017. [171] |
Hungary | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Hungary in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
India | 2014 | India banned both animal testing for cosmetics and the import of cosmetics tested on animals in 2014. [161][160] |
Ireland | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Ireland in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Israel | 2007 | Israel banned animal testing for cosmetics in 2007. In 2013, the country banned the import of cosmetics tested on animals. [159] |
Italy | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Italy in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Latvia | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Latvia in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Lithuania | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Lithuania in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Luxembourg | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Luxembourg in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Malta | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Malta in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Mexico | 2021 | Mexico banned animal testing for cosmetics in 2021. [173] |
Netherlands | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in the Netherlands in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
New Zealand | 2015 | Though no cosmetics animal testing had ever been performed in New Zealand, the country banned the practice in 2015. [162][163] |
Poland | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Poland in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Portugal | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Portugal in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Romania | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Romania in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Slovakia | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Slovakia in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Slovenia | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Slovenia in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
South Korea | 2016 | South Korea banned the distribution and sale of cosmetics tested on animals in 2016. [164] |
Spain | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Spain in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Sweden | 2004 | Cosmetics animal testing is banned in Sweden in accordance with the country’s membership in the European Union. [157][158] |
Switzerland | Cosmetics animal testing is de facto banned in Switzerland. According to the Federal Council, “Animal testing may only be conducted in Switzerland when absolutely necessary. Harmful animal testing must therefore be limited to the absolute minimum. Animal testing for cosmetic products does not meet the applicable requirements. Therefore, animal testing for cosmetic products is no longer permitted in Switzerland, even if there is no explicit ban. [169] | |
Taiwan | 2016 | Taiwan banned animal testing for cosmetics in 2016. [165] |
Turkey | 2016 | Turkey banned animal testing for cosmetics in 2016. [168] |
United Kingdom | 1998 | The U.K. originally banned animal testing for cosmetics in 1998 (the first country to do so). However, after Brexit in 2016, the UK reverted to European Union (EU) rules related to animal testing in 2019, which required some animal testing for cosmetics if there were no alternatives, especially where employee safety was concerned. In those cases, a license for animal testing was issued to the company by the government. In 2024, the UK announced that no new licenses would be issued and legacy licenses would be reviewed. [156] |
Assessment Quiz
After reading the above debate, take our assessment quiz to test your knowledge of this issue. Good luck!
1-minute Survey
After reading this debate, take our quick survey to see how this information affected your opinion of this topic. We appreciate your feedback.
Discussion Questions
- Should animals be used to test new drugs? Why or why not?
- Should animals be used to test cosmetics? Why or why not?
- Research alternatives to animal testing for drugs and cosmetics. Which, if any, do you think are the best? The worst? Explain your answers.
Take Action
- Consider Stanford Medicine’s defense of animal testing.
- Analyze the FDA’s statement on using animals to test cosmetics.
- Explore Cruelty Free International, an organization against animal testing.
- Consider how you felt about the issue before reading this article. After reading the pros and cons on this topic, has your thinking changed? If so, how? List two to three ways. If your thoughts have not changed, list two to three ways your better understanding of the “other side of the issue” now helps you better argue your position.
- Push for the position and policies you support by writing U.S. senators and representatives.
Sources
- The Hastings Center, "Fact Sheet: Animals Used in Research in the U.S.," animalresearch.thehastingscenter.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Speaking of Research, "U.S. Statistics," speakingofresearch.com (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Animal Welfare Act, gpo.gov, last amended June 18, 2008
- The Jane Goodall Institute of Canada, "Conservation & Threats," janegoodall.ca (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Science Museum (UK), "Thalidomide," sciencemuseum.org.uk (accessed October 17, 2013)
- U.S. Department of Defense, "Animal Care and Use Programs for Fiscal Years 2006 and 2007," dtic.mil (accessed October 15, 2013)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), "A Brief History of Animals in Space," history.nasa.gov (accessed October 17, 2013)
- Chicago Tribune, "Nasa Loading More Than 2,000 Animals into Shuttle," chicagotribune.com, April 15, 1998
- California Biomedical Research Association, "CBRA Fact Sheet: Why Are Animals Necessary in Biomedical Research?," ca-biomed.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- AnimalResearch.info, "Diseases & Research," animalresearch.info (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Elizabeth Fisher, "Why We Should Accept Animal Testing," huffingtonpost.co.uk, July 17, 2013
- Speaking of Research, "Alternatives?," speakingofresearch.com (accessed October 15, 2013)
- American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, "Animal Research FAQ," aalas.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Associated Press, "Texas Research Chimps Face Retirement, Relocation," khou.com, July 22, 2013
- Kara Rogers, "Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Progress Report," britannica.com, September 17, 2007
- Jonathan Smith, "Can Biotechnology Reduce Animal Testing in Medicine?,” labiotech.eu, April 8, 2019
- Understanding Animal Research, "Myths and Facts," understandinganimalresearch.org.uk (accessed October 15, 2013)
- David Wright, Cole Kazdin, and Lauren Effron, "’Zoobiquity’: 7 Diseases Animals Share with Humans," abcnews.go.com, June 12, 2012
- Speaking of Research, "Animal Research Is Not ’Animal Testing,’" speakingofresearch.com, January 17, 2013
- U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), "Laws Related to the Protection of Human Subjects: World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki," history.nih.gov (accessed October 15, 2013)
- California Veterinary Medical Association, "Animal Research: How It Benefits Both Humans and Animals," cvma.net (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Peter Beaumont, "Australia’s Koala Crisis: Gene Sequencing Provides Hope against Killer Diseases," theguardian.com, April 20, 2013
- American Veterinary Medical Association, "Use of Animals in Research, Testing, and Education," avma.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Christian E. Newcomer, email to ProCon.org, October 11, 2013
- Americans for Medical Progress, "Animal Research FAQs: The Top 10 Questions," amprogress.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), "Annual Report Animal Usage by Fiscal Year: 2010," aphis.usda.gov, July 27, 2011
- Rutgers University Laboratory Animal Services, "II. Federal, State And University Laws, Regulations, Guidelines And Policies," las.rutgers.edu (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Charlotte Hu, "Of Mice and Model Organisms,” cshl.edu, July 31, 2019
- George Dvorsky, "Do These Startling Longevity Studies Mean Your Lifespan Could Double?," io9.com, April 30, 2013
- Science Daily, "Naked Mole Rat’s Secret to Staying Cancer Free," sciencedaily.com, July 31, 2013
- Nature Genetics, "Editorial: Animal Research and the Search for Understanding," nature.com, 2006
- Americans for Medical Progress, "Touring an Animal Research Facility," youtube.com, October 21, 2008
- Tibor R. Machan, "Animals Do Not Have Rights," nytimes.com, April 5, 2012
- A. Barton Hinkle, "Do Animals Have Rights?," reason.com, September 23, 2011
- Daniel Cressey, "Animal Research: Battle Scars," nature.com, February 23, 2011
- American Physiological Society, "Animal Research," the-aps.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- National Association for Biomedical Research, "Mission Statement," nabr.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- American Heart Association, "Public Policy Agenda 2010-14," heart.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Society of Toxicology, "Animals in Research Public Policy Statement," toxicology.org, March 1999
- American Cancer Society, "Did You Know...," main.acsevents.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, "Nonprofits: Endorse the Campaign," safecosmetics.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, "Animal Testing and Cosmetics," fda.gov, April 5, 2006
- Bloomberg News, "China Animal Testing Complicates L’Oreal’s Expansion," bloomberg.com, August 22, 2013
- SC Johnson, "SC Johnson Point of View on Animal Testing," scjohnson.com, October 23, 2019
- King James Bible, "Genesis 1:26," kingjamesbibleonline.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), "Animal Ethics," bbc.co.uk (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Humane Society International, "About Animal Testing," hsi.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Scientific American, "Do Cosmetic Companies Still Test on Live Animals?," scientificamerican.com (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Rodrigo Netto Costa, et al., "A Reassessment of the in Vitro Total Protein Content Determination (TPC) with SIRC and 3T3 Cells for the Evaluation of the Ocular Irritation Potential of Shampoos: Comparison with the in Vivo Draize Rabbit Test," Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, November-December 2011
- Geoff Watts, "Alternatives to Animal Experimentation," British Medical Journal, January 27, 2007
- Axonn News Agency, "Greiner Bio-One Launches Artificial Skin to Replace Animal Testing," zenopa.com, July 15, 2013
- New England Anti-Vivisection Society (NEAVS), "Biomedical Research," neavs.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Humane Society International, "As Home Office Statistics Show UK Animal Experiments At Shocking 4.11Million, HSI Calls on Government to Increase Spend on Non-Animal Replacement Techniques," hsi.org, July 16, 2013
- Jeffrey M. Perkel, "Life Science Technologies: Animal-Free Toxicology: Sometimes, in Vitro is Better," sciencemag.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), "Vioxx Tragedy Spotlights Failure of Animal Research," pcrm.org, March 2005
- NBC News, "Report: Vioxx Linked to Thousands of Deaths," nbcnews.com, October 6, 2004
- Understanding Animal Research, "Nine Out of Ten Statistics Are Taken Out of Context," understandinganimalresearch.org.uk, January 23, 2013
- Aysha Akhtar, "Want to Improve Medical Research? Cut Out the Animals!," huffingtonpost.com, July 11, 2013
- Junhee Seok, et al., "Genomic Responses in Mouse Models Poorly Mimic Human Inflammatory Diseases," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), February 11, 2013
- Marcel Leist and Thomas Hartung, "Inflammatory Findings on Species Extrapolations: Humans Are Definitely No 70-kg Mice," Archives of Toxicology, 2013
- Humane Society International, "Costs of Animal and Non-Animal Testing," hsi.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Kathleen Conlee, "Animal Testing Not Effective," live.huffingtonpost.com, July 12, 2013
- U.S. National Institutes of Health, "NIH Budget," nih.gov (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Carol Kilkenny, et al., "Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals," PLOS One, 2009
- Humane Society of the United States, "Questions and Answers about Biomedical Research," humanesociety.org, September 16, 2013
- Peter Singer, Animal Liberation, 2009
- Richard Dawkins, "But Can They Suffer," richarddawkins.net, June 29, 2011
- Humane Society of the United States, "Undercover Investigation Reveals Cruelty to Chimps at Research Lab," humanesociety.org, March 4, 2009
- Marjie Lundstrom, "UC Davis Researcher Suspended over Animal Care Allegations," Sacramento Bee website, October 7, 2012
- King James Bible, "Proverbs 12:10," kingjamesbibleonline.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- U.S. National Academy of Sciences, Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals: Eighth Edition, 2011
- National Association for Biomedical Research, "Species in Research," nabr.org (accessed October 15, 2013)
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, "Small Business Assistance: Frequently Asked Questions on Drug Development and Investigational New Drug Applications," fda.gov (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Benjamin Adams and Jean Larson, "Legislative History of the Animal Welfare Act," nal.usda.gov (accessed October 17, 2013)
- Daniel Engber, "Where’s Pepper?," slate.com, June 1, 2009
- Frank Newport and Igor Himelfarb, "In U.S., Record-High Say Gay, Lesbian Relations Morally OK," gallup.com, May 20, 2013
- Joy Wilke and Lydia Saad, "Older Americans’ Moral Attitudes Changing," gallup.com, June 3, 2013
- Lake Research Partners, "Ending Cosmetics Testing on Animals in the United States: Findings from a Nationwide Survey of 802 Registered Voters, Including 206 Via Cell Phone," humanesociety.org, 2013
- Richard R. Sharp, "Ethical Issues in the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research," hhs.gov (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Anita Guerrini, Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Galen to Animal Rights, 2003
- U.S. National Institutes of Health, "Greek Medicine: Galen," nlm.nih.gov, February 7, 2012
- Rachel Hajar, "Animal Testing and Medicine," Heart Views, January-March 2011
- Anita Guerrini, "The Rhetorics of Animal Rights," Applied Ethics in Animal Research: Philosophy, Regulation, and Laboratory Applications, Ed. John P. Gluck et al., 2002
- British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), "William Harvey (1578 - 1657)," bbc.co.uk (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Domenico Ribatti, "William Harvey and the Discovery of the Circulation of the Blood," Journal of Angiogenesis Research, September 21, 2009
- Ivan Petrovich Pavlov, Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex, 1927
- British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, "Records of the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection," nationalarchives.gov.uk (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Sir Rickman John Godlee, Lord Lister, 1918
- National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), "The Challenge of Animal Research," nc3rs.org.uk (accessed October 15, 2013)
- Darian M. Ibrahim, "Reduce, Refine, Replace: The Failure of the Three R’s and the Future of Animal Experimentation," Social Science Research Network website, March 4, 2006
- Joanne Zurlo, Deborah Rudacille, and Alan M. Goldberg, "The Three R’s: The Way Forward," Environmental Health Perspectives, August 1996
- David Whitehouse, "First Dog in Space Died within Hours," news.bbc.co.uk, October 28, 2002
- Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), "Military Avoids Timeline to Modernize Combat Trauma Training," pcrm.org (accessed October 16, 2013)
- Ernesto Londoño, "Military Is Required to Justify Using Animals in Medic Training after Pressure from Activists," washingtonpost.com, February 24, 2013
- Mike M. Ahlers, "Coast Guard Reexamines Use of Live Goats as Battle ’Patients,’" cnn.com, May 3, 2013
- Daniel Engber, "Me and My Monkey," slate.com, June 5, 2009
- Sheryl Gay Stolberg, "Debate over Whether to Defend Animal Tests," nytimes.com, July 23, 2002
- James Kanter, "E.U. Bans Cosmetics with Animal-Tested Ingredients," nytimes.com, March 11, 2013
- Alicia Graef, "Victory! India Bans Animal Testing for Cosmetics," care2.com, July 2, 2013
- James Gorman, "U.S. to Begin Retiring Most Research Chimps," nytimes.com, June 26, 2013
- Nobel Media, "The Discovery of Insulin," nobelprize.org (accessed October 16, 2013)
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, "Annual Report Animal Usage by Fiscal Year,” aphis.usda.gov, January 7, 2020
- Encyclopædia Britannica, "Ahimsa," britannica.com (accessed October 16, 2013)
- National Academy of Sciences, "Report Calls for New Directions, Innovative Approaches in Testing Chemicals for Toxicity to Humans," nationalacademies.org, June 12, 2007
- Aysha Akhtar, Animals and Public Health: Why Treating Animals Better Is Critical to Human Welfare, 2012
- Arthur Allen, "Of Mice or Men: The Problems with Animal Testing," slate.com, June 1, 2006
- Aysha Akhtar, email to ProCon.org, October 14, 2013
- Karl S. Kruszelnicki, "Mouse with Human Ear," abc.net.au, June 2, 2006
- Ray Greek, et al., "The History and Implications of Testing Thalidomide on Animals," Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law, October 3, 2011
- John J. Pippin and Kristie Sullivan, "Dangerous Medicine: Examples of Animal-Based ’Safety’ Tests Gone Wrong," Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine website (accessed October 23, 2013)
- Pro-Test, "Frequently Asked Questions," pro-test.org.uk (accessed October 23, 2013)
- World Health Organization, "Poliomyelitis," who.int, April 2013
- Pamela Bass, email to ProCon.org, October 21, 2013
- Julie Naughton, "China’s FDA Adjusts Mandatory Animal Testing," Women’s Wear Daily, November 7, 2013
- Tom Holder, "Animal Research Is an Ethical and Vital Tool to Fight Disease," blogs.law.harvard.edu, January 14, 2013
- Mike Wall, "U.S. Was First to Send Monkey to Space in 1948," nbcnews.com, January 28, 2013
- National Institutes of Health, "NIH Will No Longer Support Biomedical Research on Chimpanzees," nih.gov, November 18, 2015
- Global Polio Eradication Initiative, "Polio This Week," polioeradication.org (accessed September 22, 2017)
- Julie Steenhuysen, "As Pressure for Coronavirus Vaccine Mounts, Scientists Debate Risks of Accelerated Testing,” reuters.com, March 11, 2020
- Carly Funk and Lee Rainie, "Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society," pewinternet.org, January 29, 2015
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), "Annual Report Animal Usage by Fiscal Year: 2016," aphis.usda.gov, June 27, 2017
- United States Department of Agriculture, In Re: SNBL USA, LTD: AWA Docket 16-0187, September 26, 2016
- Alice Klein, "Chlamydia Vaccine for Koalas Slows Spread of Deadly Disease," newscientist.com, April 21, 2017
- John Ericson, "Breakthroughs Might Mean the End of Animal Testing," newsweek.com, March 18, 2014
- Jeff Flake, "Wastebook: Porkemon Go," flake.senate.gov, January 2017
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), "Tell Congress: Cut Funding for Cruel Experiments on Animals," support.peta.org (accessed October 18, 2017)
- Emily Trunnell, "The University of Pittsburgh Is Using Taxpayer Dollars to Conduct Cruel and Unnecessary Animal Experiments," alternet.org, September 7, 2017
- Stacy L. Pritt and Robert E. Hammer, "The Interplay of Ethics, Animal Welfare, and IACUC Oversight on the Reproducibility of Animal Studies," Comparative Medicine, April 2017
- New Internationalist, "Is Animal Testing Necessary to Advance Medical Research?" newint.org, June 1, 2011
- Humane Research Australia (HRA), "Medical Research," humaneresearch.org.au, January 2006
- Mihir Zaveri, Mariel Padilla, and Jaclyn Peiser, "E.P.A. Says It Will Drastically Reduce Animal Testing," nytimes.com, September 10, 2019
- Frontiers, "Algorithm for Large-scale Brain Simulations,” sciencedaily.com, March 5, 2018
- Bruce Einhorn, "A Virus Cure Depends on Rare Lab Mice, But There Aren’t Enough,” bloomberg.com, March 11, 2020
- Mihir Zaveri, Mariel Padilla, and Jaclyn Peiser, "E.P.A. Says It Will Drastically Reduce Animal Testing,” nytimes.com, September 10, 2019
- The Humane Society of the United States, "Animals Used in Biomedical Research FAQ,” humanesociety.org (accessed March 17, 2020)
- Perfect365, Inc., "New Survey from Perfect365 Reveals 36 percent of Women Prefer to Purchase Cruelty-Free Beauty," businesswire.com, March 29, 2018
- Market Research Future, "Cruelty-Free Cosmetics Market Research Report - Global Forecast till 2024,” marketresearchfuture.com, March 2020
- European Commission, “Ban on Animal Testing,” ec.europa.eu (accessed March 17, 2020)
- Nicole Pallotta, "California Bans the Sale of Most Cosmetics Tested on Animals,” alder.org, October 15, 2018
- Elizabeth Siegel, "Why Beauty Brands Still Test Their Products on Animals," allure.com, October 20, 2017
- Rachel L. Roper; and Kristina E. Rehm, "SARS Vaccines: Where Are We?,” medscape.com, 2009
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, "Coronavirus Vaccine: NIH Isn’t Waiting for Pointless Animal Tests,” peta.org, March 16, 2020
- Michelle Roberts, "Coronavirus: U.S. Volunteers Test First Vaccine,” bbc.com, March 17, 2020
- Nicoletta Lanese, "Researchers Fast-Track Coronavirus Vaccine by Skipping Key Animal Testing First,” livescience.com, March 13, 2020
- Eric Boodman, "Researchers Rush to Test Coronavirus Vaccine in People without Knowing How Well It Works in Animals,” statnews.com, March 11, 2020
- Rachel Bucchino, "New FDA Policy Allows Lab Animals to Be Adopted after Experiments,” thehill.com, February 7, 2020
- Moderna, "Moderna’s Work on a Potential Vaccine Against COVID-19,” modernatx.com (accessed March 18, 2020)
- Sui-Lee Wee, "Future Vaccines Depend on Test Subjects in Short Supply: Monkeys," nytimes.com, February 23, 2021
- Tom Branna, "China To End Animal Testing for Imported ’Ordinary’ Cosmetics," happi.com, March 5, 2021
- Humane Society International, "Mexico Becomes First Country in North America to Outlaw Animal Testing for Cosmetics," hsi.org, September 2, 2021
- Joe Hernandez, "The FDA No Longer Requires All Drugs to Be Tested on Animals before Human Trials," npr.org, January 12, 2023
- U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, “Annual Report Summary,” aphis.usda.gov, October 28, 2024
- Emily Anthes, “Lab Animals Face Being Euthanized as Trump Cuts Research” (April 29, 2025), nytimes.com
- National Institutes of Health, “NIH to Prioritize Human-based Research Technologies” (April 29, 2025), nih.gov
- National Institutes of Health, x.com (May 4, 2025)
- EcoMundo, “Animal Testing Bans: The Fine Line Between Cosmetics and Chemical Regulations in Europe” (October 21, 2024), ecomundo.eu
- European Commission, “Ban on Animal Testing” (accessed May 6, 2025), single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu
- European Animal Research Association, “REACH Testing for Cosmetic Ingredients” (accessed May 6, 2025), eara.eu
- Viva Sarah Press, “Israel Bans Import of Cosmetics Tested on Animals” (January 8, 2013), israel21c.org
- Rupali Mukherjee, “Govt Bans Cosmetic Companies From Testing on Animals” (January 23, 2014), timesofindia.indiatimes.com
- Vishwa Mohan, “India Bans Import of Cosmetics Tested on Animals” (October 14, 2014), timesofindia.indiatimes.com
- Parliamentary Counsel Office New Zealand Legislation, “Animal Welfare Amendment Act (No 2) 2015” (accessed May 7, 2025), legislation.govt.nz
- Library of Congress, “New Zealand: Animal Welfare Legislation Recognizes Animals as Sentient, Bans Cosmetic Testing” (May 19, 2015), loc.gov
- Korea Legislation Research Institute, “Article 15-2 (Prohibition of Distribution or Sale of Animal-Tested Cosmetics)” (accessed May 7, 2025), elaw.klri.re.kr
- UL Solutions, “Taiwan Bans Animal Testing in Cosmetics Products” (November 7, 2016), ul.com
- Health Canada, “Health Canada Announces the End of Cosmetic Animal Testing in Canada” (June 27, 2023), canada.ca
- Government of Canada, “Animal Testing Bans on Cosmetics” (accessed May 8, 2025), canada.ca
- Baker McKenzie, “Turkey Restricts Animal Testing for Cosmetics” (January 12, 2016), lexology.com
- Maya Graf, “Ban on Animal Testing for Cosmetics, Cleaning and Household Products” (December 18, 2015), parlament.ch
- Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, “Use of Animal Test Data” (March 21, 2025), industrialchemicals.gov.au
- Diario de Centro America, “Congreso de la República de Guatemala Decreto Número 5-2017” (April 3, 2017), gongreso.gob.gt
- Global Crossings, “Concea’s Resolution N. 58.2023 and the End of Animal Experimentation for Cosmetics” (accessed May 8, 2025), globalcrossings.com
- Jenna Romaine, “Mexico Becomes First North American Country to Ban Animal Testing for Cosmetics” (September 8, 2021), thehill.com
- Loren Moss, “Colombian Government Steps Up Enforcement of Ban on Animal Testing for Cosmetics” (October 10, 2024), financecolombia.com
- GPC, “Chile Prohibits Animal Testing for Cosmetics” (January 29, 2025), gpcgateway.com
- National Association for Biomedical Research, nabr.org (accessed May 10, 2023)
- Mihir Zaveri, Mariel Padilla and Jaclyn Peiser, “E.P.A. Says It Will Drastically Reduce Animal Testing,” nytimes.com, September 10, 2019
- USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, “Research Facility Annual Usage Summary Report” (October 28, 2024), aphis.usda.gov
- PETA, “Victory! President Signs Groundbreaking FDA Modernization Act 2.0,” peta.org, December 27, 2022
- Andrew Wheeler, “Directive to Prioritize Efforts to Reduce Animal Testing,” fda.gov, September 10, 2019